<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi,<br><br></div>recent syslog-ng versions should be fast enough to follow http access log files, but I give you that transferring compressed files can be more performant, although the latency is definitely higher. (in the order of minutes instead of seconds).<br><br></div>Cheers,<br></div>Bazsi<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Kevin Kadow <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kkadow@gmail.com" target="_blank">kkadow@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Centralizing logging from Apache may not be a good fit for syslog-ng, I'd instead consider aggressively rotating logs on each server where the websites are hosted, then use a file-based transfer mechanism.<br></div>
<br>______________________________________________________________________________<br>
Member info: <a href="https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng" target="_blank">https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng</a><br>
Documentation: <a href="http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng" target="_blank">http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng</a><br>
FAQ: <a href="http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq" target="_blank">http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq</a><br>
<br>
<br></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Bazsi</div>
</div>